It has now become obvious that Kennedy, the paid party executive director Bradley Davidson and former state campaign chair for Obama’s campaign, Leanne Townsend,
had been planning to walk away from the party to start something new
for some time before the budget meeting where Kennedy and Joe Reed got
into it. According to key sources, the state party’s fund raising Website had
already been disabled months before the April meeting when the visible
split occurred. Members of the Over the Mountain Democrats had tried to
make donations, but got nothing but error messages. When they tried to
report it, they were given the cold shoulder.
My advice to them at the time? The real progressive Democrats in Alabama
— and there are many, in spite of the false picture painted by the
corporate media institutions here — should unite and figure out a way to
take over the Democratic Party and rewrite the platform, like the
conservative, religious wing of the Republican Party took it over in the
1980s.~ Glynn Wilson
Don Lemon isn't the first CNN Talking TeeVee Pundit Head to promote the Fox News false, black-on-black crime, narrative, to deflect from the real issues surrounding the injustices in the Trayvon Martin case.
The black-on-black crime argument says that blacks
in America have no right to complain about white-on-black crime till
they do something about black-on-black crime. It is a racist deflection. Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Chris Wallace
and others on the right used the argument in the days after the George
Zimmerman verdict. Whitewashed people bring it up whenever crime and
race are at issue.
It allows the white press to determine reality,
which makes it seem like Zimmerman is an exception while no one is doing
anything about black-on-black crime. As it turns out, on average there
is a Zimmerman-style shooting (armed security person or vigilante
killing an unarmed black person) once every 28 hours. Trayvon Martin is
just what made the papers. His case is hardly the worst nor the only one
to get protests. Likewise, there is plenty being done about
black-on-black crime, like by the Nation of Islam, but the white press
is not particularly interested in reporting that either. Even worse, the
white press turns a blind eye to the bad policing that leads to a high
black crime rate. Yet, somehow, it always seems to find time to show
black male suspects on the 11 o’clock news.
Until Don Lemon, Bill O'Reilly and other are willing to address the root
causes of violence, they need to shut the hell up. Don Lemon, why
didn't you rant on and on about poverty, unemployment, gun control,
inferior schools and mass incarceration?
Why? Because that would be too much like right (no pun intended).
Thanks to Alabama State Senator Scott Beason, (r. Shelby County) and his republican enablers, Alabama's has some new guns laws, which according the Beason and Co. are designed to clarify Alabama's concealed-and open carry-laws and ensure law-abiding citizens have access to guns.
You can openly carry your gun without a permit as long as you don't conceal your gun. However, the police still have the right to stop and question you if are openly carrying a gun. Huh?
So stop wearing your hate with pride. Stop
celebrating your anti-science, anti-math ignorance. Stop using
code words to mask your bigotry like "family values",
especially when you hate my family and when you stand on the same
stage as a guy who has had three marriages or if you share a seat
in the Senate with a guy who cheated on his wife with hookers
while wearing diapers. You should be ashamed. I know that you are
just doing this to motivate your misinformed hate cult base
because if they actually knew that your ideas will make them
poorer than they are now, they would never vote for you. You are doing
your best to impoverish your countrymen so rich people can get
bigger tax breaks and you can keep on delivering corporate
welfare to the special interests who have bribed you, and I am
disgusted by the way you gleefully parade your hatred with
aplomb. I don't think you do love America. At least, not as much
as you hate everyone in America who isn't exactly like you.
You should think about that, and maybe get some help.
And for the record, I do not hate you. I am
embarrassed by you and nauseated by your cruel and thoughtless
behavior and your all consuming greed, but I do not hate you. I
forgive you and I hope you can change someday, but I don't hate
you. You have enough hate in you for the rest of us as it is.
As moving as your speech was, it did not address these issues that we
face every day and minimized the daily racial inequalities that
African-Americans face. Above all, words with no actions can be futile.
After the fervor surrounding the Trayvon Martin case has subsided, will
race drift to the back burner again? Will African-Americans be forced
into silence and oblivion once again?
Rabid Republicans are also acting with renewed zeal to roll back voting rights in key Southern states. In North Carolina and Texas,
GOP-led legislatures are resurrecting a catalogue of Jim Crow-era
barriers to minority voting, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court
overturning of the 1965 Voting Right Act’s toughest enforcement
provision. In North Carolina, the GOP wants to repeal 20 years of best practices that made North Carolina a model of fair and accessible elections. In Texas, the GOP wants to revise political districts to dilute minority representation and pass tougher voter ID laws.
She didn't understand the difference between intentional murder and manslaughter.
She didn't understand what constitutes evidence and proof.
She didn't realize that the jury can draw conclusions from the entirety of the evidence.
The “not guilty” Simpson verdict sparked great divisiveness across
the country. Some alleged that Simpson was only found not guilty because
the predominantly black jury did not want to convict a fellow member of
the African-American community. The George Zimmerman prosecution and defense teams should have
considered the potential for such a response in this case, because race
was at issue from the outset. This case should not be about race, but the attorneys’ failure to
pick a more diverse group of six people is certain to reignite the
issue, especially if the 100 percent all-female/non-African-American
jury finds Mr. Zimmerman not guilty.
What does empathy have to do with inequality? At this GGSC event, Robert Reich, former U.S. secretary of labor and a professor at UC Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy, discusses how socio-economic inequality contributes to frayed social bonds—and explains what we can do about it.
The Greater Good Science Center studies the psychology, sociology, and neuroscience of well-being, and teaches skills that foster a thriving, resilient, and compassionate society.
I don't listen to his show, but I browse his blog because everybody knows it's his job to keep the white, I mean right wing bigots in line, and I must admit he is doing a pretty good job.
In the interest of full disclosure I was banned from his blog, but he's not banned from mine, which I why I am responding to his latest round of right wing malarkey here.
According to Dale: Blacks make up 13.6% of the population and commit 28.4% of the
crimes,AND almost half the murders in the entire country because they are well......black and that's just what they do.
Dale is WRONG on every level and FBI Table 43A-C of the Uniform Crime Code for 2011 is PROOF not only that blacks don't COMMIT the most crimes, but that blacks are ACCUSED, ARRESTED and CONVICTED of more crimes than whites.
In the 25 states that have similar "Stand Your Ground" type of laws,
white people who kill black people are 354% more likely to be cleared
than whites who kill other whites. If we are to ask the United States
Department of Justice to investigate a potential civil rights violation
against Trayvon, we should also ask them to investigate the racial
disparity of how these laws are applied across the country. In the words
of Attorney General Eric Holder last week at an NAACP convention, do we
have the right to “stand our ground to insure that our laws reduce
violence, and take a hard look at the laws that contribute to more
violence than they prevent?”
From the very beginnings of this nation-state, America has practically done nothing else but talk
about race. The whole idea and reality of race itself is enshrined in
the constitution wherein black people are defined as only three-fifths
human.
The lingering image of the happy-go-lucky Southerner, content with his
lot, happy to get a pat on the head from the local patriarch, is being
shaken to its core. Across the U.S. South, workers, activists and
regular citizens are standing up to GOP right-wingers, the Koch Brothers
and next-of-kin plutocrats like Art Pope, and privatizing,
corporate-driven organizations like ALEC (American Legislative Exchange
Council).
You said: Many maintain Zimmerman was the aggressor (and therefore not entitled
to defend himself) because he followed Martin and got out of his truck.
Following someone is not per se(sic) illegal and neither is exiting your
truck. You also said: In the 911 tape I heard played in court, I did not hear the
dispatcher tell him not to get out of the car. The dispatcher asked
Zimmerman if he was following Martin. Zimmerman said yes. The dispatcher
then said we don't need you to do that and Zimmerman said okay. Zimmerman
claims that the dispatcher asked for the street address of where he was
and that he got out of the truck to read the street address on the
house.(Plausible to anyone who has ever tried to read an address in a
subdivision) So in my opinion it was not proven that Zimmerman followed Martin after being told not to.
You said: Was Martin racially profiled? It appears that a series of crimes had
been committed in Zimmerman's neighborhood by young black males and
Zimmerman assumed that Martin could be one of them.
You asked: But was it truly unreasonable for Zimmerman to call Police to check Martin in that situation?
Calling the police was not unreasonable, and if that's all George Zimmerman had done we wouldn't be having this discussion. Instead he and his Cal Tech,(which he didn't tell the dispatcher who told him 'we don't need you to do that'), he had, stalked Trayvon because he was tired of the themF*cking Coons always getting away.
Specifically, Sen. Vivian Davis Figures, D-Mobile, said the
election and subsequent re-election of President Barack Obama triggered a backlash
by white Alabamians that allowed the state's Republican Party to capture
overwhelming control of the Alabama Legislature in 2010 in addition to defeating
the last Democrat to hold a statewide office that same year, Lucy Baxley, then
president of the Alabama Public Service Commission.
There is an old saying in Alabama...if you throw a rock at a pen full of pigs the one that squeals is the one that's hit. State Senator Vivian Figures called out racism.
Until somethings done about the institutional and structural components
that allow racism to maintain its existence and until more Americans
acknowledge racism without diving into a rather paternalistic and/or
defensive response over it, there's not much hope in changing things for
the better.
So, the white, male, dominated media is patting themselves on the back for allowing President Obama to talk about race for the second time in 5 years after being prodded/pushed to do so by black folks. Tavis Smiley had the audacity to tell the truth on Meet the Pest, I mean, Press Sunday and got a royal beat down on twitter .
To be clear, this is WHAT Tavis said Sunday on Meet the Press:
The media narrative now is that Obama walked to the podium for an
unscripted address because he felt he needed to say something. But the
truth is that “he was pushed to the podium,” Smiley said. “A week of
protests outside the White House, pressure building on him inside the
White House, pushed him to that podium.” Smiley noted he did“appreciate
and applaud the fact that the president did finally show up.” But “the
bottom line is, this is not Libya. This is America. On this issue, you
cannot lead from behind. What’s lacking in this moment is moral
leadership.”
And the problem is what exactly? What did Tavis say that wasn't true? According to an article in the New York Times, President Obama met with 5 of his closest (unnamed) advisers on Thursday evening who told him it was time for him to say something. My question is why did they have to tell him it was time to say something? He didn't know? Those who don't read the Washington Post weren't aware of the calls for President Obama to speak out from prominent African Americans.
In the wake of the not-guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial, President Obama has called
on the American people to engage in calm reflection. Few expected the
president to denounce the verdict or call upon people to take to the
streets in protest, but we did expect him to speak in a way that touched
the heartbreak, despair and quiet rage that so many of us feel at this
moment. On multiple occasions, Obama has asked blacks to understand the
high wire he is forced to walk on the subject of race. He has pleaded
that we cut him some slack. Most have done so even as conditions in the black community have become more desperate.
You won't hear writers like Cortland Maloy on TeeVee saying things like this:
In the never-ending cycle of pleas, protests and prayers over recurring
injustice, we’re again approaching the quiet times. Put down the signs.
Take off the hoodies. Remove the empty bags of Skittles taped over your
mouths. Go in for some “calm reflection,” as President Obama put it in a
statement following Saturday night’s miscarriage of justice.
The white, male, dominated media forced President Obama to walk a tight rope on race, they molded him into their vision of how the first African American President of the United States of America should act/talk/think/govern.
I believe some whites were actually afraid President Obama was going to
exact some kind of revenge for slavery and Jim Crow. So, in their zeal
to shape the first African American President in their image, they
turned him into a token with no power. Someone they could point to and
say America is post racial. As if the emasculation of black men in America needed more assistance.
I never believed Obama was going to be the the black people's President and only the the black people's President,
because I believed him when he said there were no red states or blue
states but the United States of America. But, his advisers were so
afraid that if he showed any sympathy or empathy to the plight of blacks
it would look like he was giving blacks "special treatment".
On Friday, Obama used the words “black” or “African American” 17
times, and the word “white” only once. At times, the president appeared
to be the Explainer-in-Chief, clarifying for white folks a history and
legacy that they, too, share—but in drastically different ways, and
usually as benefit. Yet, by not specifically addressing this audience,
by silencing whiteness and choosing to center again and again on black
young men, Obama gave whiteness a pass. He gave it power by masking it,
and making it silent. While he warned black folks against violence, which he said would
dishonor Trayvon Martin, he remained silent about the little violence we
do know about—when a white woman attacked 73-year-old R&B legend Lester Chambers
following the verdict. And rather than convening a national
conversation about race—which would might mean having frank conversation
about white supremacy and privilege, Obama talked about his daughters.
Yes, Malia, Sasha and their friends are different, but that’s likely due
to their security detail, and to the fact that they live in a world
that most black schoolgirls simply do not.
I HOPE President Obama's surprise comments made white people understand what it means to be black in America, but unless he stops letting the white, male, dominated media frame the debate there is no HOPE for CHANGE African Americans or anyone else for that matter, can believe in.
"Why are white people so mean"? This is the question the 8 year old grand daughter of a friend asked her as they left the movie theater after seeing the movie The Help. My friend was shocked at first, thinking maybe the movie was too mature for an 8 year old, but then she decided to turn it into one of those teachable moments. Over ice cream at Maggie Moo's she explained that not all white people were mean, she reminded her of her teachers, friends, neighbors, and other white people in her life who weren't mean to black folks. She told her not to judge people by the color of their skin but how they treated her (the content of their character), and to apply the golden rule, treat others as you wish to be treated. My friend said her granddaughter appeared to be satisfied by her answer, but she was sure the movie had an impact that would influence her future prospective, because even an 8 years old knows the difference between good and mean.
Just as my friend explained to her grand daughter that the actions of some aren't the actions of all, the nation needs to know that not all black people are criminals just because of the color of the skin.
Trayvon Martin was killed because he was black. George Zimmerman, the Sanford Police Department and the 0% African American jury, assumed he "was up to no good", not because he was "up to no good", but because he was a black male, was walking home from the store, with candy and a drink, talking on the phone, at 7:00 PM, wearing a hoodie. It's too bad their grandmothers didn't teach them that not all black people are bad.
I'm still trying to figure out how the white judge, the white prosecutors, the white defense team, and the white jury got to declare "race was not a factor" in a case about racial profiling, in a state with a documented history of racism.
Immediately after the verdict there was not one person of color speaking out about the verdict on TeeVee. CNN even had Texas Governor Rick "N-word head ranch" Perry of all people on air saying justice is color blind.
This is the media that forced President Obama to tone down remarks made by Attorney General Eric Holder because he asked if Americans were cowards when it came to discussing matters of race.
This is the media that forced President Obama to have a "beer summit" with the Boston police officer who acted stupidly and arrested Dr. Henry Louis Gates for getting uppity in his own damn house.
So
yes, let's have a real discussion about race and racism. I mean a real
hope-to-die, get it all out in the open discussion. It's times to
drain the poison off, so that this nation can heal. The whole world is
watching. ~GrannyStandingforTruth
I HOPE the white, male, dominated, media won't stand in the way this time.
Last night on AC360, Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, said the importance of the Justice Department review of the Trayvon Martin case and the Stand Your Ground law is so that parents know what to tell their children.
He raised a more chilling question, too. When the next child is murdered in a Stand Your Ground state, what do you think the defendant will say?
In June, right after the Zimmerman jury selection, Attorney Crump said:
"Well, you know, we've said all along this case is about equal justice. Equal justice under the law is not a black value, it's not a white value, it's an American value. And with the make-up of this jury, five white women and one hispanic, it's gonna be the question can every American get equal justice no matter who sits on your jury. And so, they're just praying that they can get justice for their child."
Sadly and disgustingly, we know how that worked out.
In a gut-wrenching chronology, Journalist Charles Blow enumerated the many ways the system failed Trayvon Martin.
Then, he asked what parents are asking, "What do I tell my boys?"
The idea of universal suspicion without individual evidence is what Americans find abhorrent and what black men in America must constantly fight. It is pervasive in policing policies — like stop-and-frisk, and in this case neighborhood watch — regardless of the collateral damage done to the majority of innocents. It’s like burning down a house to rid it of mice.
As a parent, particularly a parent of black teenage boys, I am left with the question, “Now, what do I tell my boys?”
We used to say not to run in public because that might be seen as suspicious, like they’d stolen something. But according to Zimmerman, Martin drew his suspicion at least in part because he was walking too slowly.
So what do I tell my boys now? At what precise pace should a black man walk to avoid suspicion?
And can they ever stop walking away, or running away, and simply stand their ground? Can they become righteously indignant without being fatally wounded?
Right now we send our Black children disturbingly contradictory signals on how to conduct themselves so that they are free from discrimination and violence. Here are a few examples:
1) Black boys and men should not walk too quickly or run because that suggests they've done something wrong. They also should not walk too slowly because that suggests they must be looking for trouble.
2) Young black men should not put their hands in their pockets but should instead always keep their hands where others can see them. They should also avoid gesticulating, because others might misinterpret their gestures as aggressiveness.
3) Black boys and men should wear business attire at all times because casual clothes—especially hoodies—suggest they're up to no good.
4) Black youth should never hang out with more than three friends at one time, because large groups are likely to be mistaken for a gang. They should also be careful about walking alone—young men hanging out by themselves, like Trayvon Martin, are suspicious.
5) When shopping, whether at a grocery store or a department store, young Black men should check out quickly in order to avoid suspicion. But they should not check out too quickly, because that means they've pocketed merchandise on their way out.
6) Young black men should never make eye contact with others because it is threatening; they should never avert their eyes because that looks furtive.
7) Black men must be careful about walking, driving, or flying while black, especially in neighborhoods or in destinations where there are typically not a lot of black people. But they should avoid low income neighborhoods, because that is where the police are even more inclined to respond with brutality and arrest.
8) And the most important lesson of all to be learned from this tragedy is that Black boys and men must be careful about defending themselves because, no matter what happens, they will be seen as the aggressor.
She ends with a call to action.
"I simply don't know what to tell my son about how to live his life under these circumstances. I have known for a long time that there is nothing I can do to protect my son from prejudice. But I simply refuse to accept that there is nothing I can do to protect him from violence. This is the current reality that my son and countless parents like me face, but we cannot stop here.
The Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, placed blame on Juror B-37, in the most objective way: she simply didn't think of Trayvon as "her child." Juror B-37 couldn't relate to Trayvon, and there is the real tragedy: her empathy for the dead Trayvon was the same as for his murderer, George Zimmerman.
Indeed, Juror B-37 was so partial to Zimmerman that she excused his behavior with her assessment of his motivations. "But he wanted to do good. I think he had good in his heart, he just went overboard," the juror told CNN. Asked later whether she thought Zimmerman was within his rights, she said: "He was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin." After all, as George Zimmerman absolved himself of his personal responsibility for killing Trayvon, it was "all God's plan." Imagine the internal outrage Trayvon's parents must have felt when George Stephanopoulus asked them how they felt about George Zimmerman's parents praying each day for Trayvon. And yet, Trayvon's father, Tracy Martin, mild mannerly only questioned their sincerity.
One only needs to skim through the list of 46 phone calls to see that Zimmerman was overzealous in his pursuit of those in his neighborhood displaying "suspicious activity." On April 22, 2011, Zimmerman called police about suspicious activity by a "Juvenile black male 'apprx 7–9' years old, four feet tall 'skinny build short blk hair' last seen wearing a blue t-shirt and blue shorts."
Yes, that's right. To George Zimmerman, a little boy was suspicious, although he wasn't wearing a hoodie. Now I'm not sure what would be, to Zimmerman, "suspicious" about a young boy, other than he was black. Not that Zimmerman would be profiling on the basis of race, of course, despite the allegations of trial witness no. 9, Zimmerman's cousin. She said "...that Zimmerman and his family always had a bias against Blacks and only liked them if they 'acted White.'" Zimmerman defended himself against that charge by saying he was cleared of any racial profiling by the FBI.
And Zimmerman was cleared of murdering Trayvon Martin, too. God's plan?
Thank you, Juror B37, for making it clear that prejudice and stupidity did lead to the Zimmerman verdict. At least we don’t have to guess
— David Poland (@DavidPoland) July 16, 2013
In case you haven't noticed I've been away from the blog for the last week mega thanks to my friend and fellow contributor Chip for filling in for me. It's a good thing I was not in a postition to blog after the jury acquitted George Zimmerman for racially profiling, stalking, and shooting 17 year old Trayvon Martin because frankly I needed time to heal.
I wasn't surprised the 100% Female 0% African American jury let George Zimmerman get away with murder, but Lord was I hurt. It was like someone stabbed me through the heart with a hot dagger. To think 6 women, some of whom are mothers, would condone a grown man stalking and killing a child of any age/race/gender is beyond me.
This jury profiled Trayvon in death as George Zimmerman profiled him in life. Their sons and daughters don't have to be afraid of being stalked, profiled and deemed unworthy, of being in middle class neighborhoods.
The 6 jurors are cowards. Let me say that again. The 6 jurors are cowards. They threw a rock then hid their hands. The media should be ashamed for enabling their cowardice. They certainly didn't protect the identities of the OJ jurors, or, the Casey Anthony jurors, which leads me to believe there is something rotten in the cotton, and I'm not the only one questioning how, and why, this jury was selected.
The media also needs to stop enabling the Zimmerman clan to racially profile black people by advancing the meme he "will be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life" because the criminal black folks will take the law into their own hands because they can't accept the jury verdict.
Oh really? Trayvon Martin was looking over his shoulder in fear of his life that fateful night when George Zimmerman became the judge, jury and the executioner. We are not George Zimmerman's.
All we ever asked for was for equal justice for the young man who was
killed that drizzling night in Sanford, Florida. If George Zimmerman had
rights, so did Trayvon Martin. And that is why Mr. Zimmerman was
properly arrested and charged with murder in the second degree. He will
soon be judged by a jury of his peers, and that is the best we can do.
Whatever decision they make, is a decision that we must live with,
whether we like it or not. Whether George Zimmerman is found innocent or
guilty by the jury, I am firm believer that all of us live by karmic
law, and he will ultimately be punished for the death of Trayvon, no
matter what. However, if he walks free out of that courtroom, I
understand that some people will be very sad, but we must remember the
mission we are on. As I have heard Trayvon's parents say time and time
again, they are not only fighting for justice for their son, they are
fighting for all of us, especially those parents who have to live
through the misery of burying their child and the sadness that comes
after.
To my white friends who ask me not to judge them based on the actions
of Zimmerman and this jury let me say this...I know not all white
people are racist, prejudiced, bigots. To think the opposite would make
me no better than the George Zimmerman's of this world.
Martin and Fulton have started a foundation named after their son and say they hope his death and the trial can serve as a catalyst to bring the country together.
According to the foundation's website, "The Trayvon Martin Foundation was established by Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin in March, 2012 as a not-for-profit organization, under the auspices of the Miami Foundation. The Foundation’s purpose is to create awareness of how violent crime impacts the families of the victims, and to provide support and advocacy for those families, in response to the murder of Trayvon Martin. The scope of the Foundation’s mission is to advocate that crime victims and their families not be ignored in the discussions about violent crime, to increase public awareness of all forms of racial, ethnic and gender profiling, educate youth on conflict resolution techniques, and to reduce the incidences where confrontations between strangers turn deadly."
During the ABC interview with George Stephanopoulous, Trayvon's father, Tracy Martin, said: "I think moving forward we need to educate ourselves as a community on the gun laws, on the laws, on the statutes. "We need to come together more as a whole, not individual people, not individual races, religions. We need to come together as God's people.
"We need to start learning each other, understanding each other. You can't just judge a book by its cover," he said. "Something is wrong in so many ways to say that someone is suspicious just because you don't know them."
Trayvon's mother, Sybrina Fulton, said the outpouring of support the family has received shows the effect the case has had across the nation.
"It's not just about the Trayvon Martin case," Fulton said. "Now it's about your kids. It's about other kids.
It was a stunning verdict. So stunning, in fact, that it took me a couple of days to come to grips with it. I had to allow the shock to envelope me as I worked through stages of disbelief, outrage, sorrow, embarrassment, incredulity, sympathy, shame and more...Finally, today, the emotions began to sort themselves out to the point that I could begin seeing the implications of the jury's verdict head-on.
That was the crux of it, and yet, the perpetrator walked free. George Zimmerman set the stage for what he wanted to do: murder someone. As we all know, he was told not to follow Trayvon, but the real telling moment was when he asked the dispatcher to call him when the police arrived. If he had stayed in his vehicle, and given the police its location, there was no need for a phone call. But that wasn't what George Zimmerman intended to do, because "These assholes always get away."
Trayvon Benjamin Martin, who his mother heartbreakingly described on the witness stand as "in Heaven," was profiled and stalked, just as surely as the sun rises and sets. In George Zimmerman's estimation, Trayvon "didn't belong" in that neighborhood. Profiling was nothing new to Zimmerman, who, over the course of eight years, called the Sanford Police Department 46 times to report suspicious activity - by black males.
Zimmerman had a history of violence against a police officer and a former fiance.
Whether it was that history of violence or his own psychological profile that led to Zimmerman's rejection for a police career isn't clear.
What is clear is that the justice system failed Trayvon, and failed all of us. Whatever the situation that night, Trayvon didn't need to die that night, had he not met up with a sociopath. I'd wager we haven't seen the last of George Zimmerman, karma being what it is.
His skin that was out of place in that neighborhood.
His skin that America thinks is an automatic reason to distrust someone.
His skin.
That is what got Travon Martin killed. He was killed by a punk bytch ass
failure, that wanted to prove to the local fuzz that they should have
never passed him over.
So I am not surprised that the trial is going the way it is. I will not
be mad or upset when this bytch walks out of the courthouse to the
applause of his family, friends and his fellow Americans.
I am not surprised.
This is the "norm" for America.
This is what we do here in the land of the "free".
Black people in this country are Guilty until proven not so guilty.
"While the judge limited the ability of the prosecution
to bring race into focus and to talk about racial profiling, among other
things, race remains at the center of the trial and the criminal justice
system—at the heart of life and death. The demands for colorblindness amid the
realities of a racist America means that this trial, like those before, are
playing out according to the hegemonic script: black criminalization and white
innocence.It is my hope for a new
ending where justice and mourning no longer remain a dream deferred. " David J. Leonard
George Zimmerman's defense team is defending the indefensible by profiling Trayvon Martin even in death. Don't get me wrong, I'm not mad at Zimmerman's team for mounting a vigorous defense of their client, this is America and everyone has a right to a fair trial, my fear is the 100% white 0% African American jury will fall for the Okey-Doke and say it's okay for an armed adult to stalk an unarmed black teen, get into an altercation because the teen is scared to death (literally) shoot them, then claim self-defense. Despite the claim coming from the mouth of the Lord of Loud in an attempt to rile up his base, black folks aren't going to riot if the jury acquits George Zimmerman. To be honest. I'm more worried about some (not to be confused with all) white folks reaction if George Zimmerman is convicted. Just in case George Zimmerman walks free...
All we ever asked for was for equal justice for the young man who was
killed that drizzling night in Sanford, Florida. If George Zimmerman had
rights, so did Trayvon Martin. And that is why Mr. Zimmerman was
properly arrested and charged with murder in the second degree. He will
soon be judged by a jury of his peers, and that is the best we can do.
Whatever decision they make, is a decision that we must live with,
whether we like it or not. Whether George Zimmerman is found innocent or
guilty by the jury, I am firm believer that all of us live by karmic
law, and he will ultimately be punished for the death of Trayvon, no
matter what. However, if he walks free out of that courtroom, I
understand that some people will be very sad, but we must remember the
mission we are on. As I have heard Trayvon's parents say time and time
again, they are not only fighting for justice for their son, they are
fighting for all of us, especially those parents who have to live
through the misery of burying their child and the sadness that comes
after.
Honestly, Redeye, if I were black I don't think I'd have the courage to have children in this country.~havealittletak Honestly havealittletalk, it takes courage to be black in this country.
I am sick and damn tired of supposedly unbiased, white (yes I'm playing a race FACT), male, (yes I'm playing the gender FACT) journalist getting to decide who/what/when/where a candidate is credible or not, or, when someone/something is racist/racism, or not? Who elected them God? I mean really? Al.com's Joey Kennedy wrote a column entitled Democrats need a credible candidate for governor, even it's it's a lost cause in which he proclaims Alabama is a solidly republican state and Bentley is very popular. I wonder why? Snark Who is Bentley very popular with....the GOP? Who gets to decide who is credible? Dr. Jess Brown? Jess Brown, a political science professor at Athens State University,
said the absence of a Democratic candidate for governor at this point is
“indicative of the weakness of the Democratic Party.” In an email,
Brown said the Democrats have lost so many races in Alabama “that it is a
party without an effective message or messengers.” Uh, no Dr. Jess Brown, the party has messengers, they just aren't allowed to express their opinions in the mainstream press like you. How about an opinion from a political science professor at Alabama A&M University, Tuskegee University, Alabama State University, University of Alabama in Birmingham, Miles College? Let's just stop having elections and let Kennedy and others decide who the winners are. The reason Alabama is solidly republican is because journalist know they can count on the uniformed and misinformed to hate democrats more than they love their county, city, state, country, or themselves for that matter. I sure do miss the good old days when the media used their powers for good, and informed the public of what we needed to know to make informed decisions, and let the voters decide who/what is credible or not. It's the media, I won't say stupid, because we aren't stupid, It's the media who caters to stupid. No wonder more and more people are turning to the blogosphere for unfiltered information.
Fumbling Toward Divinity: Remembering Four Little Black Girl On Sunday, 15th September, 1963, a white man was seen getting out of a white and turquoise Chevrolet car and placing a box under the steps of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church. Soon afterwards, at 10.22 a.m., the bomb exploded killing Denise McNair (11), Addie Mae Collins (14), Carole Robertson (14) and Cynthia Wesley (14). The four girls had been attending Sunday school classes at the church. Twenty-three other people were also hurt by the blast.
Civil rights activists blamed George Wallace, the Governor of Alabama, for the killings. Only a week before the bombing he had told the New York Times that to stop integration Alabama needed a "few first-class funerals." Again, the reason I oppose the republican party has nothing to do with me being a democrat, and I don't oppose republicans just to support democrats. I oppose republicans because the people who perpetrated the 16th Street Baptist Church bombings and other terrorist acts joined the GOP. I oppose the Alabama Democratic Majority because they believe the Alabama Democratic Party is the black man's party, like that's a bad thing. Does this sound familiar? Prior to the the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Nixons Southern Strategy, these people were loyal democrats, then the Democratic Party split along sectional lines in the aftermath and the republicans reached out to the disaffected Southern Democrats, encouraging them to join the GOP. The party did not change the Dixiecrats, the Dixiecrats changed the party.
When Lyndon Johnson signed the 1965 voting Rights Act, he said “there goes the Democratic Party in the South.” How right he was.
"What ever political party draws it's strength from these people is the party I'm going to work to defeat. " Are you with us, or are you with them? That is the question.