Today marks the
150th anniversary of the day
President Abraham Lincoln (R. IL) signed the
Emancipation Proclamation as our nation approached the third year of the
War between the States.
The proclamation declared
"that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are,
and henceforward shall be free."
So, I'm sitting here 150 years later wondering how the party that freed the slaves turned into
the party that is trying to bring back slavery? The answer can be found in the graphic below.
The mainstream media have completely missed the story, by portraying the
Tea Party movement in ideological rather than regional terms. Whether
by accident or design, the public faces of the Tea Party in the House
are Midwesterners — Minnesota’s Michele Bachmann and Joe Walsh of
Illinois. But while there may be Tea Party sympathizers throughout the
country, in the House of Representatives the Tea Party faction that has
used the debt ceiling issue to plunge the nation into crisis is overwhelmingly Southern in its origins:
John Quincy Adams:
[to the Court] This man is black. We can all see
that. But, can we also see as easily, that which is equally true? That
he is the only true hero in this room. Now, if he were white, he
wouldn't be standing before this court fighting for his life. If he were
white and his enslavers were British, he wouldn't be standing, so heavy
the weight of the medals and honors we would bestow upon him. Songs
would be written about him. The great authors of our times would fill
books about him. His story would be told and retold, in our classrooms.
Our children, because we would make sure of it, would know his name as
well as they know Patrick Henry's. Yet, if the South is right, what are
we to do with that embarrassing, annoying document, The Declaration of
Independence? What of its conceits? "All men created equal,"
"inalienable rights," "life, liberty," and so on and so forth? What on
Earth are we to do with this? I have a modest suggestion.
[tears papers in half]
Welcome to 2013!