"Whose side are they on?" On this day in 1957, the Governor of Arkansas used tax dollars to block African American taxpayers from entering Central High School in Little Rock. Fast forward 57 years later, Huntsville City Schools is still using tax dollars to prevent African American Students from having access to a quality public education, enabled by the United States Department Justice.
In a
letter sent to parents with students enrolled in grades 3-12
HCS claims they have invited the Department Justice to meet with students in order to gain information related to the long standing desegregation order, which they are bound and determined to be released from, by hook or by crook.
A couple of points of interest:
1. If you do not return the form by September 4, 2014, your child will
be entered into a potential pool of students to be interviewed by the
Department of Justice SEEMINGLY WITHOUT PARENTS PRESENT FOR THE
INTERVIEW. The interviews will take place after school at Boys and Girls
Club locations across the city. Not every child will be chosen. This is
an “opt-out” procedure. If you don’t opt-out, and your child is at a
Boys and Girls Club location during the week of September 8th through
the 12th, your child will be interviewed without a parent being present.
2. If parents wish to participate in similar Parents Meetings being
held on Saturday, September 14, and Sunday, September 15, there is a
separate form to sign and return to Barbara Cobbs of Huntsville City
Schools. They will then chose which parents they wish to interview with
the stipulation that parents agree to the following: "I understand that
participation in the parent focus groups is confidential. I shall not
disclose the fact of my participation or any information or discussion
from the focus group meeting."
There is just one thing wrong with their little plan, it
is unconstitutional for HCS to conduct an investigation or interview a child on private property without the parent present. I can understand
HCS ignoring the constitution because they've been
doing it for years, but you would think
the United States Department of Justice would know better by
now.
The U.S. Department of Justice, a party to the case, objected to the
assignment plan and in February the dispute landed before Haikala,
who'd been appointed to the bench by President Obama in 2012.
In the judge's 107-page ruling, she blasted school officials for
failing to provide required reports on the district's integration
progress for two decades. She also criticized the Justice Department for
failing to be "proactive" and to "keep an eye on" the marked
disparities in schools serving mostly white children and those serving
mostly black ones.
Opt in or to
Opt Out? That is the question. At the
June 17, 2014 BOE meeting HCS approved policy 6.28- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
EXCERPT:
Schools may disclose, without consent, "directory" information such as a
student's name, address, telephone number, date and place of birth,
honors and awards, and dates of attendance. However, schools must tell
parents and eligible students about directory information and allow
parents and eligible students a reasonable amount of time to request
that the school not disclose directory information about them. Schools
must notify parents and eligible students annually of their rights under
FERPA. The actual means of notification (special letter, inclusion in a
PTA bulletin, student handbook, or newspaper article) is left to the
discretion of each school.
Translation: if parents don't notify the school district they don't want their students information printed in the hand book, or their
image/ names to be used, and they don't Opt OUT, their child is automatically IN.
This change requires parents to take action when they otherwise would
not have been required to. Under the old policy, they had to give
written consent for their student to be INCLUDED in the directory. The
difference is not subtle. It's the old
silence gives consent Idiom.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive. I'm beginning to think neither side wants a solution, which plays right into the segregationist strategy of
segregation today,
segregation tomorrow,
segregation forever?
Time will tell the truth. Sigh
And believe me when I say that I kicked myself harshly when I learned it was still active.